Estate planning for families who have a child with a developmental
disability must be done carefully. It is best to seek advice from a
professional financial planner who is knowledgeable about the legal
issues surrounding the accumulation of financial assets by an adult
with a disability.
An adult with a developmental disability may be disqualified from
needs-based government funding programs if he/she has financial assets
of more than $2000.00 in his/her name, including life insurance
policies.
You should seek legal counsel for estate planning for an adult child with a developmental disability. You may want to ask about:
Guardianship, Substitute Decision Making, End of Life Decisions
Substitute Decision Making for a Person with Disabilities
One question I have been called on frequently to answer over the years
is whether parents or other close family members have the ability to
serve as substitute decision-makers for their adult child or other
loved one with a disability. The law has undergone a change that became
effective in early 2008 which provides some new options.
At the outset, it is important to understand that when we talk about
substitute decision making there are two distinct categories of
possible substitute decision making. The first involves property rights
and financial matters and the other is involved with personal care and
health care issues.
Property rights and financial matters.
This aspect of substitute decision making is encountered far less
frequently than issues involving personal care decisions, etc. The
reason for this is that in many cases persons with disabilities do not
have significant assets requiring administration and frequently only
receive income from government programs which allow for the
establishment of Representative Payees to handle this program income.
Representative Payees are governmentally recognized agents for persons
receiving government assistance and for many individuals nothing
further is required.
In any case where a Representative Payee is not completely adequate,
such as where the substitute decision making involves other sources of
income or administration of assets that are not permitted to be handled
by a Representative Payee (such as private income sources or privately
held assets owned by the person with a disability), it is necessary
that the substitute decision-maker receive a formal appointment. This
can happen in one of two ways:
a) the person with a disability can officially appoint the substitute
decision-maker by designating them as an agent under a written power of
attorney; or
b) the person desiring to be substitute decision-maker would have to be
appointed guardian of the estate for the person with a disability in a
court-ordered guardianship.
The first of these two options can only happen if the person with
a disability has the legal capacity to knowingly and intelligently
designate the substitute decision-maker as agent under the power of
attorney. If this is possible, the power of attorney is the best route
to take because it does not result in a person with a disability having
to be declared legally incapacitated.
The guardianship route by contrast, has the disadvantage of
requiring a declaration of incapacity of the person with a disability
and a further disadvantage of the requirement for ongoing court
supervision and annual filings with the appointing court. Guardianship
is also less flexible in that a guardian does not have the ability to
use any of the principal funds received by the Guardian without
specific court authorization. An agent under power of attorney is free
to spend either principal or income without court approval. However it
must be stated that an agent under power of attorney is still a
fiduciary under the law and is fully accountable to the person who
appointed him and can be held responsible for any improprieties by
court proceedings.
Personal care and health care issues.
It is in this area that recent changes in Pennsylvania law have offered
new alternatives to substitute decision-makers. Prior to these changes
the two alternatives discussed above of a power of attorney, or
court-appointed guardianship were the only ways to handle substitute
healthcare decision-making. In the guardianship alternative the person
appointed is known as "guardian of the person" of the individual in
question. The appointment of guardian of the person also requires a
declaration of incapacity.
Effective early in the year 2008 Act 169 restated the law of healthcare
decision-making, including both proactive healthcare decision-making
and end-of-life decision-making. This Act has combined the concepts of
a health care power of attorney and an advance directive for
end-of-life decision-making into a single piece of legislation. This
new law establishes a hierarchy of persons who are entitled to make
decisions for another person. The Act gives due regard to substitute
decision-makers appointed under a valid power of attorney, or by
court-appointed guardianship, but goes further and provides for an
entire system of substitute decision making when neither of those
appointments is possible, or has occurred.
Accordingly, if substitute decision making is required for person with
a disability and there is no one in place who has an official
appointment to play that role, there is a specified hierarchy of
persons who are authorized under the law to be the "healthcare
representative" for the individual in question. Specifically, the
persons authorized to serve as healthcare representative in mutually
exclusive categories are as follows:
(i) The spouse, unless an action for divorce is
pending, and the adult children of the principal who are not the children of the spouse.
(ii) An adult child.
(iii) A parent.
(iv) An adult brother or sister.
(v) An adult grandchild.
(vi) An adult who has knowledge of the principal's
preferences and values, including, but not limited to,
religious and moral beliefs, to assess how the principal
would make health care decisions.
In order for a healthcare representative to have the authority to act
it is necessary that an attending physician of the person with a
disability make a written declaration that the person has been found to
be incompetent under the standard provided in the Act. Once this
written declaration is in place the healthcare representative may
engage in substitute decision making for the person even if the person
objects, with the only exception being in the withholding of
life-sustaining treatment in an end-of-life situation. In that latter
case, the wishes of the person with a disability will be followed
rather than those of the healthcare representative, notwithstanding a
finding of incompetence.
As a result of Act 169 parents and other family members of persons with
disabilities can effectively provide substitute decision making for
person lacking the ability to grant a power of attorney without having
to have the person declared incapacitated and become involved in
cumbersome guardianship proceedings.
For futher information on this topic go to:http://www.millerturetsky.com
Securing future for a disabled child
By Sandra Block, USA TODAY
Most parents of special needs children realize their children probably
will outlive them, yet nearly a third have made no plans for their
child's financial future, according to a MetLife survey released
earlier this year.
And while 60% of parents said their special needs child will require
lifetime care, the majority hadn't even prepared a will, says Nadine
Vogel, founder of MetLife's special-needs division.
Letter of Intent
A letter of intent provides guidelines for your child's caregivers and
guardians after you're gone. The letter should include the child's
medical history, daily care requirements, and the child's likes and
dislikes. Here are some questions the letter of intent should address:
Read the entire article, click here...